I wonder how old are the people who frequently post on this site. I'm getting the impression that a considerable percentage of them are over 60 years old. Does anyone care to state their approximate age? I'm between age 50 and age 60.
Disillusioned JW
JoinedPosts by Disillusioned JW
-
14
Sixteen years later and wow is life different
by BlackSwan of Memphis ini have no idea if this is the right place to post this.
if you're just leaving the witnesses or questioning and toying with the idea of leaving..... life goes by fast.
and either you rip the band aid off and deal with it or let it fester and eat you alive.
-
-
Disillusioned JW
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Regarding 586 BCE rather than 587 BCE for the destruction of Jerusalem, I have seen scholarly sources for both years and I have seen scholarly sources which say "587/586" BCE (in the case of the latter I sometimes get the impression that the sources are saying the siege/destruction began in 587 BCE and was completed in 586 BCE). As a result, I don't know which precise year the destruction was completed in. Furthermore, it is not important to me know whether it was in 587 BCE instead of 586 BCE, or vice versa. I am not quibbling about a difference of only one year about a historical event which took place more than 2,500 years ago.
My opinion in very many matters unfortunately is probably very easily swayed. For example when I read a science article making a claim, such as in regards to cosmology, physics, and the scientific assessment of fossils pertaining to evolution (including the dating of fossils), I tend to readily believe/accept what the article says. Such is typically the case (unless the science article contradicts some other scientific source I read, or contradicts something which I already strongly consider to true and/or unless something seems suspicious to me in the article) until I read a different science article which contradicts something the other article said. [After all, I am no scientist and no expert in science (nor in virtually all other subjects and fields of study). I thus consider the scientists to be far more qualified in their fields than I am in those same fields.] When I discover competing views of scientists on a particular matter/topic, I then reevaulate my former conclusion on that particular matter/topic. Often times as a result of such I become uncertain as to what to believe on the details of the topic.
-
103
Jesus is Michael the Archangel
by Fisherman inonly jesus has the power and authority to defeat satan and kick him out of heaven:.
“now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our god and the authority of his christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our god.”.
-
-
Disillusioned JW
The book called A Complete Concordance to the American Standard Version of the Holy Bible: A help specially designed to promote the study and to aid in the clear understanding of the Word of God, by M. C. Hazard, Ph.D. (copyright 1922 by Thomas Nelson & Sons and published by them) says the following under the heading of "SHEOL". "The supposed placed of the dead, to which all go, and conceived of as in the depths of the earth. It is a vast, gloomy region, entered in through gates. To what extent its inhabitants were believed to be conscious is uncertain. It is also called the pit (Ps. 28:1; 30:3, and Abaddon (destruction) in Jb. 26:6; 28:22; Pr. 15:11, etc.)". Notice the phrases which I placed in boldface.
The same concordance under the heading of "HADES" says the following. "The abode of the dead, supposed to be in the center of the earth."I own a copy of that concordance.
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Regarding what happened in 605 BCE regarding Judah https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/2-kings-24/ says the following.
"i. Nebuchadnezzar came against Jerusalem because the Pharaoh of Egypt invaded Babylon. In response the young prince Nebuchadnezzar defeated the Egyptians at Charchemish, and then he pursued their fleeing army all the way down to the Sinai. Along the way (or on the way back), he subdued Jerusalem, who had been loyal to the Pharaoh of Egypt.
ii. This happened in 605 b.c. and it was the first (but not the last) encounter between Nebuchadnezzar and Jehoiakim. There would be two later invasions (597 and 587 b.c.).
iii. This specific attack is documented by the Babylonian Chronicles, a collection of tablets discovered as early as 1887, held in the British Museum. In them, Nebuchadnezzar’s 605 b.c. presence in Judah is documented and clarified. When the Babylonian chronicles were finally published in 1956, they gave us first-rate, detailed political and military information about the first 10 years of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign. L.W. King prepared these tablets in 1919; he then died, and they were neglected for four decades."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_captivity says the following.
"After the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE, the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II besieged Jerusalem, which resulted in tribute being paid by the Judean king Jehoiakim.[1] In the fourth year of Nebuchadnezzar II's reign, Jehoiakim refused to pay further tribute, which led to another siege of the city in Nebuchadnezzar II's seventh year (598/597 BCE) that culminated in the death of Jehoiakim and the exile to Babylonia of his successor Jeconiah, his court, and many others; Jeconiah's successor Zedekiah and others were exiled when Nebuchadnezzar II destroyed Jerusalem in his 18th year (587 BCE), and a later deportation occurred in Nebuchadnezzar II's 23rd year (582 BCE). "
The above confirms to me that the first siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar really was in 605 BCE instead of in 597 BCE.
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
It looks like the first siege on Jerusalem might have been in 597 BCE instead of 605 BCE, though the battle at Carchemish was in 605 BCE. See https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nebuchadnezzar-II . That article does also say the following, however. "On expeditions in Syria and Palestine from June to December of 604, Nebuchadnezzar received the submission of local states, including Judah, and captured the city of Ashkelon." But note though that https://www.rationalchristianity.net/jeremiah.html says the following.
"605 First attack of Nebuchadnezzar on Jerusalem (2 Ki 24:1-2)
597 Reign of Jehoiachin (3 months) (2 Ki 24:8-17, 25:27-30, 2 Chr 36:9-10)
597 Second attack of Nebuchadnezzar on Jerusalem (2 Ki 24:8-17)
597-586 Reign of Zedekiah (2 Ki 24:17-25:7, 2 Chr 36:10-20)
586 Third attack on Jerusalem; Jerusalem destroyed (2 Ki 25:1-21)"
2 Kings 24:1-2 (1984 NWT) says Jehoiakim became the "servant" of "Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon", but that after three years Jehoiakim rebelled and that as a result "Jehovah began to send against" Jehoiakim "marauder bands of Chaldeans" and others, and "against Judah to destroy it".
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Correction: In my prior post I meant to say "The New Oxford Annotated Bible (a study Bible) says the following regarding Jeremiah 25:11-12" instead of "The New Oxford New Annotated Bible (a study Bible) says the following regarding Jeremiah 11-12", but I ran out of time in correcting my typos.
Further information: The same study Bible says the following regarding Jeremiah 29:8-10. "In contrast to the early return from exile predicted by the other prophets, Jeremiah says the exile will last an entire lifetime (seventy years, 25.11; 27.7)."
By the way, the edition of the study Bible I am referring to is the "Augmented Third Edition", and it is for the "New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha".
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Regarding Jeremiah 29:10 and its reference to the exile being foretold to end after 70 years, it should be noted what The Interpreter's One-Volume Commentary on the Bible says. It says the following. "29:10-14. This passage is probably a later insertion, coming from an editor who knew that from the battle of Carchemish in 605 (cf. 46:2) to the Persian capture of Babylon in 539 was roughly seventy years. The intention is to encourage restoration hopes."
The New Oxford New Annotated Bible (a study Bible) says the following regarding Jeremiah 11-12. "Seventy years (cf. 29.10). The period from 605 BCE until the defeat of Babylon by Cyrus the Persian in 539 BCE is sixty-six years. Seventy, however, is likely a symbolic number, representing the length of a lifetime (Ps. 90.10)."
Regarding the WT saying that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 BCE (instead of in 587/586 BCE), the WT originally said it was in 606 BC. That year is only one year earlier than the 605 BCE date of the first siege upon Jerusalem (at least according to the Bible, see Daniel 1:1-2, and other sources). According to the Bible some captives, including Jehoiakim the king of Judah, were taken at that time into exile. The gentiles can thus be said to have begun trampling Jerusalem at 605 BCE, though Jerusalem was not desolated at that time (though it likely experienced some damage at that time). If the society were to adjust their 607 BCE teaching to 605 BCE and focus upon what happened in that year and if they also said that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 BCE or 586 BCE, then they would be much more in harmony with secular scholars. Doing such would entail a minor adjustment of their 1914 date to 1916 (or so, depending in which month the siege in 605 BCE took place in), but that would be no more a problem than their existing 1914 date. They might even wish to link it with a comment of Russell having died in 1916. Perhaps they also might go back to saying that Russell spiritually ascended to heaven in 1916 and say he began ruling with Christ in 1916, and say that the timing is highly significant. Doing that would likely require an adjustment to what they say happened in 1918 in regards to their scriptural claims.
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Jeremiah 25:11 clearly says that "these nations will have to serve the king of Babylon for 70 years" and that clearly means that the verse is saying those nations must become in servitude to Babylon for 70 years. Verses 2-9 along with verses 15-18 indicates that the kingdom of Judah was included in those called "these nations". It is not necessary that the Bible use the specific wording of "70 years of Babylonish domination or servitude" in order convey that idea, provided an expression with the meaning is clearly indicated.
scholar, since you believe the Book of Daniel describes the experiences of an actual person named Daniel, notice what Daniel 1:11-12. There is says that Daniel (in the court king of Babylon) referred himself as a servant of his guardian and the chapter indicates that the guardian was employed by "Nebuchadnezzer the king of Babylon", thus making Daniel also a servant of the king. Daniel 2:48-49 also indicates (according to the Book of Daniel) that Daniel was an employee of the Babylonian king.
But Jeremiah 25:12 is also relevant to helping us to see that the book of Jeremiah says the people of Judah (at least of Jerusalem) were to be exiled for 70 years in Babylon. My first clue to that was the heading of "70 years' exile in Babylon foretold" in the 1984 (bi12-E) edition of the NWT, on page 999 which includes Jeremiah 25:5 -19. In Jeremiah 25:12 the 1984 NWT has a scripture cross reference pertaining to when "seventy years have been fulfilled". The cross reference is to three verses of which one is Jeremiah 29:10. The heading for the page which has Jeremiah 29:10 says in part "Exiled 70 years.". The verse on that page says the following.
' “For this is what Jehovah has said, ‘In accord with the fulfilling of seventy years at Babylon I shall turn my attention to YOU people,+ and I will establish toward YOU my good word in bringing YOU back to this place.’ ' For context, note also that verse 4 of the same chapter says the following. ' “This is what Jehovah of armies, the God of Israel, has said to all the exiled people, whom I have caused to go into exile+ from Jerusalem to Babylon'. Jeremiah chapter 29 is thus very clearly saying that the Jewish people of Jerusalem (the main city of the kingdom of Judah) were to be released from exile in Babylon after 70 years. In case you wondering what "place" (to which the people were return to, according to the Bible) was referred to in verse 10, see verse 1 of the same chapter (chapter 29). That verse says the place was Jerusalem, for it says the following.
"And these are the words of the letter that Jeremiah the prophet sent from Jerusalem to the remainder of the older men of the exiled people and to the priests and to the prophets and to all the people, whom Neb·u·chad·nezʹzar had carried into exile from Jerusalem to Babylon".
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Correction: In my prior post I made an error in saying that 'The above is also further evidence that the 'Book of Daniel" has ... some incorrect predictions of what was to happen soon after the year 164 B.C.E. (such as the establishment of God's kingdom over the whole planet Earth and hence the end of all gentile governments).'
It was incorrect me to say such because the quotes I made from the two study Bibles did not point out errors in predictions in the "Book of Daniel". Furthermore, in the introductions and commentary to the "Book of Daniel" in those two particular study Bibles there was no statement of a failed prediction in the Book of Daniel. However though they did not point out any failed predictions in the "Book of Daniel", other scholarly books did point out failed predictions, and I am convinced that the predictions pertaining to what was said to happen soon after the year 164 B.C.E. are failed predictions, instead of yet to be fulfilled future events.Further information: Regarding scholar's comment to me of "This mere opinion for you notice that no firm evidence is provided for this nonsense" in reference to the what the introduction of the two study Bibles said regarding Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the two study Bibles provided some of the evidence in the commentary of the biblical verses. I did not bother type that documentation into my post. I invite those interested to read them directly in either of the two study Bibles. Furthermore, other scholarly books mention in detail how a number of verses in the "Book of Daniel" pertain to Antiochus IV Epiphanes. I encourage people to read some of those books also.
-
48
"Jehovah God"
by Jeffro inthe expression "jehovah god" has always seemed strange to me.
even when i was a jw, i found the term awkward, and never used it myself.
both words are nouns intended to be synonyms of each other, unless the name "jehovah" is being used as an adjective, which is also weird.
-
-
Disillusioned JW
Regarding belief in the biblical God and in God in general, according to "the latest Gallup Poll, belief in God dipped to 81 percent, down six percentage points from 2017, the lowest since Gallup first asked the question in 1944." See https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2022/06/24/poll-americans-belief-god-is-dropping/ for my source about that; the Gallup web page referred in the first link confirms the poll results mentioned in the above news article. The article says that the poll says "Only 68 percent of adults ages 18-29 said they believed in God (compared with 87 percent of Americans age 65 or older.)"
The article also says the following.
'Belief in God is correlated more closely with conservatism in the United States, and as the society’s ideological gap widens, it may be a contributor to growing polarization. The poll found that 72 percent of self-identified Democrats said they believed in God, compared with 92 percent of Republicans (with independents between at 81 percent).
In recent years there has been a rise in the number of Americans who acknowledge being Christian nationalists — those who believe Christian and American identities should be fused.
“It could be that the increase in the number of atheists is a direct result of Christian nationalism,” said Ryan Cragun, a sociologist at the University of Tampa who studies the nonreligious. “They seem to be dominating the rhetoric. I wouldn’t be surprised if there is legitimately backlash against it and people saying, ‘You know what? I’m an atheist.’ ” '